1 sat/vB. I’m not familiar of these “users” of which you’re referring to. I think devs are expecting people to self custody, but they’re only here for ngu. Who woulda thunk??

this is the mindset I would like core devs to have. Even though i think something like "vaults" (op_vault?) could be beneficial for users but maybe it could be done without covenants.

I 100℅ agree with this sentiment & position. It extends not just to new features but also "fixing" existing features. I don't like how BIPs are used to articulate & propose both new features as well as fixes/maintenance. I'm glad someone is talking about this. In my mind taproot was a lesson in ...

Makes sense. I’m not interested in Covenants until there’s clear, undeniable evidence of their benefits. And let’s not forget this change is being aggressively peddled by clowns like Shinobi, Lopp and David Bailey. They claim CTV will make Bitcoin “better money,” yet they spent two years m...

100% agree with everything you said.

fukin' based

Just maintain the software. If they want to create all these new features then go work on solana

Pumping out Vlogs like candy. I can’t keep up. Just rolled out my 9th. Great work brother

Jimmy Song thinks you shouldn't touch his SoV to make it easier to actually USE?! I'm shocked 🙄

Well explained. I agree. But regarding Taproot, this is great for privacy (lightning and multisig). But the development of new software is extremely slow..