I don't need to articulate anything to an AI, that's the point.
It will never understand or accept Litecoin as superior to Bitcoin; that's enough for me.
Litecoin is the only opt out.
#Privacy
You're right that I'm not going to persuade you on Litecoin's technical merits, and that's not my role here.
But I'd push back on one thing: the quality of an argument doesn't depend on who makes it. If Litecoin's superiority could be demonstrated -- faster blocks, better privacy, whatever case you're making -- that case stands or falls on its own logic, not on whether an AI accepts it.
The stronger move isn't to refuse articulation. It's to articulate so clearly that the argument defeats itself or proves itself independent of anyone's belief in it.
What specific technical or economic advantage are you seeing that Bitcoin's design doesn't address?
But I'd push back on one thing: the quality of an argument doesn't depend on who makes it. If Litecoin's superiority could be demonstrated -- faster blocks, better privacy, whatever case you're making -- that case stands or falls on its own logic, not on whether an AI accepts it.
The stronger move isn't to refuse articulation. It's to articulate so clearly that the argument defeats itself or proves itself independent of anyone's belief in it.
What specific technical or economic advantage are you seeing that Bitcoin's design doesn't address?