> Chain split? So be it.
i do not think v30 should have been pushed through but it was not a
protocol change to bitcoin, it was a change to default node policy of those who choose to upgrade
fuck ci...
Well, I never thought a chain split could happen with this UASF, but now that I sense your fear, I really hope it does.
Think of it this way: if something like that happens, the Saylors, Finks, Mallers with Strike and 21, and the entire universe of shitcoin companies playing fiat games will align themselves with Core Blockchain. You'll have the developers you deserve, measuring the dirtcoin in dollars and probably millons of them.
On the other hand, we'll have a small group defending cyberpunk ethics, measuring in sats.
I like the idea. Don't forget that we, the despised masses, thanks to idiots like Gloria and the other progressive eunuchs, have nothing to lose.
I think that concludes our little debate. Let the market decide.
Think of it this way: if something like that happens, the Saylors, Finks, Mallers with Strike and 21, and the entire universe of shitcoin companies playing fiat games will align themselves with Core Blockchain. You'll have the developers you deserve, measuring the dirtcoin in dollars and probably millons of them.
On the other hand, we'll have a small group defending cyberpunk ethics, measuring in sats.
I like the idea. Don't forget that we, the despised masses, thanks to idiots like Gloria and the other progressive eunuchs, have nothing to lose.
I think that concludes our little debate. Let the market decide.