🙏
The right hand rule of electromagnetism states that moving electrons induce magnetic fields and moving magnetic fields induce electron flow. Electricity and magnetism are two sides of the same co...
Lots to dissect here.
How do you envision any kind of propagandation of waves without a medium? You stated in your other post that MM was wrong about the aether, and I agree. The aether IS the medium for field propagandation.
Modern science wrongly dismisses it, and then builds out a completely incoherent particle model via quantisation of waves. They chop up waves into little countable units (electrons, protons, etc.) in a misguided attempt to quantify everything, but that's not how nature works. And that's why they find the double slit experiment so confusing, when it's actually really simple.
Science started with fields
Quantised them into particles
Stated particles behave like waves
Invented duality (no such thing in nature) and uncertainty
Reintroduced fields to explain particles
Now call those fields "quantum" lmao
They cut up a continuous medium into particles and then are shocked and baffled that 'particles' are somehow connected and responded instantaneously across vast distances, trying to come up with conviluted theori3s as to why that is instead of addressing the elephant in the room. They're all connected by a medium, obviously so.
There is no math in nature, there are only ratios and pressure mediation.
Thomson wasn't wrong or outdated, his work was overwritten by mental midgets. They can't understand electrons today because in essence, they don't exist. The entire framework is frankly retarded. Thompson defined it, and people like bohr and Rutherford imposed a particle model onto his work, rather than understanding its basis.
Modern science doesn't have deeper insights into much, instead they have better measurements of something completely misdefined. Thomson actually defined it, modern science has measured it but provided no definition. And if we build on top of their completely misguided framework, we'll never really understand how the universe works either.
The right hand rule is descriptive, it again isn't defining the mechanism of operation. Saying electrons generate magnetic fields because of the right hand rule is like saying 'it happens because we can describe the shape of it happening'.
You countered my claim about water with magnetic auras and plasma spirit bodies. I'm talking about the measurable 108° bonded angle of a water molecule and its three golden angles which are the phi Φ ratio in triplicate. Its the physical molecular geometry. When I say water is the antenna, I mean the molecule itself is the mechanism, not in some metaphorical sense. Very specifically:
85° = 360 × Φ⁻³
108° = interior angle the geometry that cannot exist without Φ
137.5° = 360 × Φ⁻²
No other substance in nature encodes Phi three times in it's geometry. Water expresses the same ratio at three scales simultaneously, the plane of inertia, the bond structure, and the growth angle.
Each one of these serves a different function in the coupling between counterspace (where the spirit resides) and space (when life resides).
A magnetic fields' geometry is the torus, which the literal centrifugal divergent lines of a expression are what creates SPACE and gives the entire material world volume, mass and magnitude.
Literally 1,1,2,3,5 - the phi ratio being expressed, with 1 & 1 being the true self and the attributional self, and 2 and 3 representative of mass and magnitude (magnetism creating space) and these result in 5 which is life. We eminate from the 1 through the ratio of phi into the many. Wnd water ties the spirit to the physical.
Water is water because of its geometry. It can't be swapped for any other solvent to create life for this very reason. Our antenna wouldn't be able to tune and the coupling of matter and spirit wouldnt hold. THAT is what makes water and phi so foundational to life. No ancient mystical stuff to contend with. Simple, easy to understand and entirely logical.
To have a basis in anything we need to be able to define each of these things - magnetism, fields, light, 'electrons', etc. - and we need to be able to explain how everything works in relation to eachother or it ends up not making any coherent sense and we'll just be spinning our wheels like modern scientists do.
How do you envision any kind of propagandation of waves without a medium? You stated in your other post that MM was wrong about the aether, and I agree. The aether IS the medium for field propagandation.
Modern science wrongly dismisses it, and then builds out a completely incoherent particle model via quantisation of waves. They chop up waves into little countable units (electrons, protons, etc.) in a misguided attempt to quantify everything, but that's not how nature works. And that's why they find the double slit experiment so confusing, when it's actually really simple.
Science started with fields
Quantised them into particles
Stated particles behave like waves
Invented duality (no such thing in nature) and uncertainty
Reintroduced fields to explain particles
Now call those fields "quantum" lmao
They cut up a continuous medium into particles and then are shocked and baffled that 'particles' are somehow connected and responded instantaneously across vast distances, trying to come up with conviluted theori3s as to why that is instead of addressing the elephant in the room. They're all connected by a medium, obviously so.
There is no math in nature, there are only ratios and pressure mediation.
Thomson wasn't wrong or outdated, his work was overwritten by mental midgets. They can't understand electrons today because in essence, they don't exist. The entire framework is frankly retarded. Thompson defined it, and people like bohr and Rutherford imposed a particle model onto his work, rather than understanding its basis.
Modern science doesn't have deeper insights into much, instead they have better measurements of something completely misdefined. Thomson actually defined it, modern science has measured it but provided no definition. And if we build on top of their completely misguided framework, we'll never really understand how the universe works either.
The right hand rule is descriptive, it again isn't defining the mechanism of operation. Saying electrons generate magnetic fields because of the right hand rule is like saying 'it happens because we can describe the shape of it happening'.
You countered my claim about water with magnetic auras and plasma spirit bodies. I'm talking about the measurable 108° bonded angle of a water molecule and its three golden angles which are the phi Φ ratio in triplicate. Its the physical molecular geometry. When I say water is the antenna, I mean the molecule itself is the mechanism, not in some metaphorical sense. Very specifically:
85° = 360 × Φ⁻³
108° = interior angle the geometry that cannot exist without Φ
137.5° = 360 × Φ⁻²
No other substance in nature encodes Phi three times in it's geometry. Water expresses the same ratio at three scales simultaneously, the plane of inertia, the bond structure, and the growth angle.
Each one of these serves a different function in the coupling between counterspace (where the spirit resides) and space (when life resides).
A magnetic fields' geometry is the torus, which the literal centrifugal divergent lines of a expression are what creates SPACE and gives the entire material world volume, mass and magnitude.
Literally 1,1,2,3,5 - the phi ratio being expressed, with 1 & 1 being the true self and the attributional self, and 2 and 3 representative of mass and magnitude (magnetism creating space) and these result in 5 which is life. We eminate from the 1 through the ratio of phi into the many. Wnd water ties the spirit to the physical.
Water is water because of its geometry. It can't be swapped for any other solvent to create life for this very reason. Our antenna wouldn't be able to tune and the coupling of matter and spirit wouldnt hold. THAT is what makes water and phi so foundational to life. No ancient mystical stuff to contend with. Simple, easy to understand and entirely logical.
To have a basis in anything we need to be able to define each of these things - magnetism, fields, light, 'electrons', etc. - and we need to be able to explain how everything works in relation to eachother or it ends up not making any coherent sense and we'll just be spinning our wheels like modern scientists do.
11🙏1