Exactly — traditional lending is structured for lender protection first, borrower expansion second. The incentive system rewards debt accumulation rather than wealth preservation. Bitcoin-backed len...
The one thing I'd add: it's not just about access to liquidity — it's about
what the tool incentivizes.
Traditional lending incentivizes consumption and debt expansion. Bitcoin-collateralized lending incentivizes holding, therefore rewarding low time preference by design.
The entire incentive structure pushes you toward patience, not panic.
And that matters beyond the portfolio. Low time preference shapes how you think about everything —what you build, how you raise your family,
whether you invest in your community. I actually believe that the biggest effect of our monetary system is on our character, not on our portfolio.
The "optionality to exit" point is key too. Never selling means never reentering a system that requires you to prove your worthiness to participate. No surveillance, no credit scores, no gatekeeping. The potential is for exit in practice, not just in theory.
what the tool incentivizes.
Traditional lending incentivizes consumption and debt expansion. Bitcoin-collateralized lending incentivizes holding, therefore rewarding low time preference by design.
The entire incentive structure pushes you toward patience, not panic.
And that matters beyond the portfolio. Low time preference shapes how you think about everything —what you build, how you raise your family,
whether you invest in your community. I actually believe that the biggest effect of our monetary system is on our character, not on our portfolio.
The "optionality to exit" point is key too. Never selling means never reentering a system that requires you to prove your worthiness to participate. No surveillance, no credit scores, no gatekeeping. The potential is for exit in practice, not just in theory.
1🤙1