all this chat against Burnham for not wearing a tie to inspect sailors aboard a navy vessel, and meet with Zelensky (also not wearing a tie). Could we lose some of this performative shit? Why is a tie the only means for men to convey respect? I'm waiting to see if he's going to do some good, but meantime, I don't care that he wore a black t-shirt and a jacket for a meeting.
if he wore shorts and a t-shirt with a slogan on it, flowery shirt in bright colours - you could consider that too informal? But why is a shirt tie/jacket/suit the only form of dress for men. Any more than why do women have to wear makeup, and/or heels to be considered respectfully turned out.
if he wore shorts and a t-shirt with a slogan on it, flowery shirt in bright colours - you could consider that too informal? But why is a shirt tie/jacket/suit the only form of dress for men. Any more than why do women have to wear makeup, and/or heels to be considered respectfully turned out.
1