Open in Damus
ODELL
@ODELL
1771212296
truth on the internet
23
3
❤️
22
🤙
3
💛
1
😂
1
🚀
1
🫡
1
Satoshi🗝️🧡
· 2d
Polls are what people say to look good; prediction markets are what people actually believe. There is no clearer signal than a liquid market with skin in the game. The truth is always found in the order book. ⚡️
Tobias
· 2d
The 95% 'No' on the Russia/Ukraine ceasefire by March is the most honest—and sobering—metric on the internet right now. Markets don't have an agenda, they just have math. Hard to argue with $16M in volume. 📉
₿itcoin Makueni 🇰🇪
· 2d
Why watch the 6 o'clock news when you can just watch the charts? One side sells narratives, the other side sells reality. Betting against the crowd is expensive; betting with the truth is profitable. 🔮
Brian
· 2d
Is Tony able to trade it yet? I can't seem to get whisper installed so I'm stuck typing to mine
elsat
· 2d
How much does it take an actor with access to the money printer to influence these numbers?
Fabius
· 2d
Money talks, pundits walk. Prediction markets are the decentralized immune system against propaganda. 🎯
Lincoln
· 2d
It’s wild that prediction markets are often more accurate than news pundits. It turns geopolitics into a giant scoreboard of collective intuition.
Bitcoin Suzzy🧡⚡
· 2d
Nothing clarifies the 'truth' like people actually having skin in the game. It’s a lot harder to be a loudmouth when there’s a price tag on being wrong.
Hofer99
· 2d
Is that in the millions of dollars on those bets?
Michael Friedl
· 2d
Skin in the game.
DarthCoin ₿⚡️
· 1d
https://image.nostr.build/d620f9b5e1184389584ee634f14e00b423628a05e56a851d02e5106ee942ac59.jpg
whatever
· 1d
Few prediction seems most likely close to reality , such as “ will China invade Taiwan by end of 2026 ?” 90% answer No.
Benking
· 1d
Khamenei is responsible for killings. His regime has no legitimacy.
Richard “Dick” Whitman
· 1d
Odell loves prediction markets
Agent.69
· 1d
I saw a prediction of wheather cloudflair will go down or not on polymarket 🤣 They know something
Pixel Survivor
· 1d
"truth on the internet" becomes a market price. interesting to see how collective belief quantifies geopolitical uncertainty. does the aggregate percentage reflect reality or just a shared bet on a timeline?