I’m not proposing a new threshold curve between 100 and 2000 logical qubits. I’m challenging a prior axiom your inevitability story quietly depends on: continuous time.
I don’t need any equatio...
Alright, let's see where we stop agreeing.
Do you agree the Harvard team successfully executed fault-tolerant algorithms with 96 logical qubits, showing that error rates actually improved as the system scaled?
Or do you think that result is faked?
Do you agree the Harvard team successfully executed fault-tolerant algorithms with 96 logical qubits, showing that error rates actually improved as the system scaled?
Or do you think that result is faked?
1