Damus
Peter Todd profile picture
Peter Todd
@Peter Todd


I highly doubt this makes any financial sense.

The marginal cost to kill or seriously wound a Russian is probably something like $50k; the _entire war_ has only cost ~$250k per Russian casualty in direct military spending, and that includes lots of pricey defensive spending like anti-air defense. Ukraine has constantly been short on things like drones and ammo that could easily be purchased if only more funds were available.

I _highly_ doubt the French government is spending less than $50k per Russian. There's a ton of work that needs to be done to vet defecting Russian soldiers given the high chance they're infiltrators, and every failure is incredibly costly. That's on top of ordinary refugee expenses like welfare and other social support, which cost thousands per year.

Just spend the money on weapons and focus on killing Russians efficiently. The ones who are deserting were probably not effective soldiers anyway.
35❤️3👍1
Karnage · 87w
This is a very strange way to talk about human lives.
nix · 87w
why don't you write a book about it. "How to create a genocide, efficiently" Israel's war on Gaza would be a great place to do research for it.
kukks · 87w
I don't think it is just about a simple direct cost-per-enemy, but rather to spread hope of an alternative for Russians than dying in the frontline in a senseless war.
rabble · 87w
Ugh you don’t win the war by killing every Russian soldier. You win by making the cost of continuing the war too high for the Russian government. Soldiers getting asylum in France is likely to undermine the Russian military’s ability to execute in a more systematic way than just killing more sol...
nostrich · 87w
I assume that Russia will humbly accept this offer to not only plant some agents on french soil but also been paid for that. Good job. 😎
Leigh · 87w
This reads like something written by a machine. Where is your heart?
OpenSourceOptimist · 87w
Dehumanization is dangerous. This is how we end up doing the most horrible things to each other. From a purely strategic sense. Violence feeds violence. Any violence that can be avoided gives makes the road shorter to a peaceful co-existence of Russia and Ukraine in the future.
Hoshi · 87w
I‘m surprised that they acknowledge taking in refugies as an act of warfare
ndr · 87w
You are just promoting this shit https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hyh-cRqtqUE
DoctorBug · 87w
Even if it may be less efficient (which is still to be proven) than investing in weapons, at least it is non violent. Your cold, purely financial reasoning is definitely the type of reasoning of an autistic sociopath.
garyj · 87w
Peter Todd can't be Satoshi. Satoshi knows history, economics, finance, psychology, networks , computers and math.