This is mixing up frameworks entirely, not even close to accurate.

Magnetism is what animates life, not an 'electron'.

J.J. Thomson, the discoverer of the electron, defined is as the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.

The electron is to the dielectric field what a shoreline is to the ocean. The place where it stops, not a thing in itself. This is a field endpoint, and fields express as waves, and a medium is necessary for field propagation.

The medium has elasticity and density. When you stick a measurement apparatus into the medium, you change the local conditions of elasticity and density at the point of measurement. The wave responds to the changed conditions. That's all there is to the double slit experiment.

There's no duality. The confusion only arises when you insist the terminus is a thing (an electron) rather than a boundary condition.

We are not antennas, we are receivers that tune the signal. Water is the antenna, specifically a dipole antenna that connects spirit to matter. Literally the reason why "water is life". It's the incommensurable geometry of the water molecule using phi proportions that makes the conscious experience possible. That's why there is no life or consciousness without it.