Yea I could 100% see it be the classic self serving regulatory moat or a marketing angle. But for me I was scared of how ai would play out before llms and I’ve been blown away about what they can do...
I just heard on a podcast something that resonated with me. If you're the CEO of Anthropic or OpenAI and you're saying that you're developing something that will destroy the world, you should do either of:
1. Close the company
2. Resign and let someone else run it who can develop the AI without the major risks
But doing neither tells me that it's all a political game.
1. Close the company
2. Resign and let someone else run it who can develop the AI without the major risks
But doing neither tells me that it's all a political game.
1