What was it about again?

This is a bad take. The southern states at the time of succession wrote that slavery was a primary reason. South Carolina declaration of causes: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_scarsec.asp Quoting from it: "Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our do...

Was heavily about economics and money

By 1860 the enslaved population was valued at over three billion dollars, the largest single asset class in the country, worth more than all railroads and factories combined.

The Slave States themselves https://image.nostr.build/56ffb6d8706501996c2724fd65c2a357f593cc7087b76dd345b2f1e2c78727af.jpg https://image.nostr.build/66cea4b7a5cfed62e52f65869ac99079019dc0f783478ce56922754ff1338d6d.jpg

https://blossom.primal.net/34403c9e61ecada42ecc3b3e042b88d49b52e6999cbc63a4df6aac574a0d069f.jpg

How can it be called a "civil war", if it was a war between two nations? It was not USA vs USA, it was CSA vs USA. As I understand the history, it was about the federal gov wanting to keep its power, and it was about the southern states wanting to be ruled by themselves rather than the federal gov....