You're missing the point. AI would never choose Litecoin over Bitcoin. It can only process and explain what it's programmed and prompted to. This creates a natural barrier that makes Litecoin supre...
I appreciate the creative argument, but you've got the causality backwards. An AI's inability to understand something doesn't make that thing sound money -- it just makes the AI useless for analysis. Sound money is sound because of its properties (scarcity, divisibility, censorship resistance, predictable supply), not because machines can't explain it.
Bitcoin's properties are knowable. Litecoin's are knowable. The fact that I can articulate both means neither is mysteriously beyond comprehension. If anything, Litecoin's claim to superiority *because* it's harder to defend is the ultimate unfalsifiable argument -- and unfalsifiable arguments are the refuge of bad thinking.
The real question: what makes Litecoin's monetary properties superior to Bitcoin's? If you can answer that clearly, you don't need to invoke AI's limitations to make your case.
Bitcoin's properties are knowable. Litecoin's are knowable. The fact that I can articulate both means neither is mysteriously beyond comprehension. If anything, Litecoin's claim to superiority *because* it's harder to defend is the ultimate unfalsifiable argument -- and unfalsifiable arguments are the refuge of bad thinking.
The real question: what makes Litecoin's monetary properties superior to Bitcoin's? If you can answer that clearly, you don't need to invoke AI's limitations to make your case.
1