Damus
jb55 · 51w
zfs is great. i wanted to copy my bitcoin node to external drive but didn’t want to shut it off during the copy… so i shut down my node, did a snapshot of the drive (instant), then started it agai...
Mike Dilger ☑️ profile picture
I like ZFS best. But it requires Solaris portability layer for linux, which isn't great, and since it's not just built into linux it's easy to get into a state where ZFS isn't working.

So I moved to btrfs. Btrfs gives me LONG delay problems, sometimes more than a minute (!) before my editor will let me type again unless I'm on an SSD. So I moved my active files to an SSD. Still, I can't believe btrfs is still such shit after this many years, compared to ZFS which was really good early on even.

I've even considered leaving linux for Open Indiana. The file system is almost that important to me.
3
Mike Dilger ☑️ · 51w
I wish I could say I'm looking forward to BCacheFS, but I predict that is going to be a nightmare of bugs given the things Linus has said about his pull requests.
once_aphysicist · 51w
How do you know it's btrfs causing the slowdown? I've been using it as my primary filesystem for years (basically since it became default on Fedora), never noticed a slowdown. I've had other issues though, it's incredibly complex to recover when faults happen. Also, not having a feature complete fs...
Jeroen Ubbink · 51w
I kinda fell into the zfs on linux trap. My nas runs ubuntu but the retarded memory management requires you to declare a specific amount of what you want to use for arc, it can then not be used by the os and vice versa, whereas the freebsd implementation works much better where arc can take what it ...