nostrich on nostr

Open in Damus

THE Bitcoin Podcast · 1d

SPAM IS BAD. SO IS BIP-110 nostr:nprofile1qyvhwumn8ghj7ctyw4k8gt338pcxcatn9eek7cmfv9kqz9nhwden5te0v96xcctn9ehx7um5wghxcctwvsqzpmc4r3arsr6q5awh69yn4s68kemh48vmt7s250xak3lu0ratdx5tz27l4q with nostr:npr...

nostrich 1773424795

That’s a long video to say something that fits into a short note. Here, I saved you the time to watch it:

Giacomo Zucco @giacomozucco · 2w

Replying to @edouard

To me it would create the precedent that a vocal minority with a confused proposal can effectively force a majority to change consensus. The change itself would be between good and irrelevant. The precedent would be terrible. Same issue of when they tried to push CTV activation c Show more

1

Giacomo confuses consensus with policy. BIP-110 doesn't force a consensus change - it restores the `datacarrier` config option Core deleted in v30. It gives node operators a choice they used to have. If that's "forcing consensus," then Core v30 was a coup. The actual precedent: Core maintainers (...