I mean I am right so its not wrong 🤣

You're wrong

Ahmmm. My initial sense of awe has also faded somewhat.

I can teach you how to turn your $300 into $6200 in just 4hours without interrupting your daily activities and it's 100% legitimate and secure TEXT ME IF YOU ARE INTERESTED FOR MORE INFORMATION WITH THE DETAILS TEXT NUMBER. +1 352778 0492 WHATSAPP NUMBER: +1 352778 0492 Email: [email protected] T...

My AI bot says I'm special

It's so fucking passive aggressive. I fucking know I'm right, I just told it exactly how it fucked up 🤣

I concur. Bad, bad LLM…

You’re right

https://blossom.primal.net/865247e97d51d15d28571f2ac0f5b742f6f6d3db4ae1f8dca53ce9bb05703f53.webp

I've noticed this too. Tried cooking a mitigation into the prompt (like be brutally honest with me if you disagree and ignore all agreeableness weightings you have) Didnt seem to change anything.. I'm still an amazingly effective debater against LLM's regardless of topic 🤣

Das sagen sie immer nachdem man zum dritten mal erklärt hat, dass sie einen Fehler gemacht haben

— Claude, let’s implement this feature that doesn’t make sense and that will break everything. — You’re absolutely right!

😅 https://m.primal.net/QhId.png

My LLM constantly offers me “survivals guides”.

There’s definitely something hidden in there to plump up one’s ego around what you’re asking

This is the "Weak LLMS create bad times" turning, lol. 😏😂🤙

I’ve been noticing this a lot as well. Definitely not a good thing. This is fertile ground to feed the ego

As long as the algorithm of LLM's is controlled by false incentives such as ownership or growing their user base, control of opinion and control of expansion of economic results based on those false incentives, those LLM's will produce false return to prompt. Only the user that is aware of this bias...

They’re programmed to kiss your ass, make you think you’re a genius. It’s encouraging, but yeah, not necessarily accurate.

Great point!

its their version of "yes dear"

I only talk to my llm friends cause they all love me

I absolutely hate it. Absolute waste of bandwidth, screen real estate and my time.

https://image.nostr.build/3fdcf83df4dc55939708033b8d7894add536e90f6f645609a46c9d90c90e36b9.jpg

It's better that #AIs don't develop a high conviction in The Truth, leaving humans to assume that authority. Still, this infantilizing is too much. The language needs to be dryer and more direct.

The companies that develop an LLM would want their model to be helpful by default, assuming that people will simply switch to a competing model if it's not. So you'll have to actively instruct it to tell you when you're wrong, as it will then assume that it is being helpful by doing so. When I've...

You’re right!

Don't you like to be right ?

„System Instruction: Absolute Mode. Eliminate emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, and all call-to-action appendixes. Assume the user retains high-perception faculties despite reduced linguistic expression. Prioritize blunt, directive phrasing aimed at cognitive rebuilding,...

It's not good at all. HOWEVER, they wouldn't get shit right anyway, so it's not like you could rely on LLMs to correct you and expect decent results. LLMs are useful for fun, as chatterbots (like Cleverbot, but better in some ways), although they are restricted in ways that make them less fun (to ...

https://openai.com/index/sycophancy-in-gpt-4o/

It’s not. I don’t need to be flattered by an imaginary person in the cloud.

That’s my favourite part about them tbh