lmao no

For now. Anyone can fork Bitcoin core.

In an extremely technical sense maybe, but wrong on many other levels.

Probably not for long

It's 80% bitcoin and falling. One can only hope for Bitcoins sake it vanishes where it belongs to together with its devs.

GFY

You do not change Bitcoin, Bitcoin changes you.

People will use whichever fork of Bitcoin suits their needs. The current main branch might not be around forever, but the project goes on...

It's not, according to Bitcoin Core: > Bitcoin is a network that is defined by its users, who have ultimate freedom in choosing what software they use (fully-validating or not) and implementing whatever policies they desire. Bitcoin Core contributors are not in a position to mandate what those are....

Bitcoin is a protocol, Core is a reference implementation. https://blossom.primal.net/0b71d1eee8eb355d983e5b8af3031e1fd105b1b5fdc19ef04288ea92b2eaad9c.png

Small dick energy

Bitcoin is what the majority decides

Can someone tell me why increasing op_return size limit is a good thing? How does it make bitcoin better as a monetary network? Does it make lightning, Ark, or ecash way better?

They are censoring my right to censor. I'll stop using core.

De jure, no. But de facto...sadly, yes--unless more nodes run knots.

bitcoin is what the node runners say it is. ... and a good number of them seem to disagree with you. ... not enough to fork ... yet.

No. https://image.nostr.build/7cb8efc16a10ff42f29d689d1fdd49fefb6226580c290923db039fbb5c970c26.jpg

Factually inaccurate. Bitcoin node software is mostly Bitcoin Core, but soon 20% will be Knots.

how about you volunteer for this kind of one client one protocol maximalism by quitting with damus and notedeck then? primal is enough. primal is good. everyone loves primal.