Damus
SatsAndSports · 3w
What's the goal? More precisely, what do you mean by 'proof'? I don't think you're really asking about SP, and key derivation, and Diffie-Hellman shared tweaks, or any of that. You're asking more abou...
Vitor Pamplona profile picture
Yes, I was talking about ZK proofs. That's the only way I see being able to please those complaining about on-chain traces forever.

Either that or we go back to the mess of trusting that zaps happened, like you described. Which is a massive problem today since it is quite easy to fake a zap and most clients offer Zap counts as a way to give reputation to a post in the feed.
1
SatsAndSports · 3w
Thanks for clarifying. I'm trying to be neutral-ish on this topic now, and to just clarify the questions. (And maybe I shouldn't have dismissed ZK so much; I don't really understand ZK well enough to have an opinion on whether it's ready for this now) ==== Continuing to think out loud ... === Even...
Karadenizli · 3w
You can always fake zaps by just paying someone to zap you. Proving that someone really sent you money is not solving anything. What are you even solving by putting it on chain? I can spin up npubs and zap myself on chain, paying only the TX fee. So you still have to WoT the zaps, same as you are w...