Betting is immoral. It doesn't bring any value. And betting with your sats is even more idiotic, it shows that you do not know the real value of your sats. Bitcoiners should not promote these crap gambling platforms.

Have you done a rundown of bip110 anywhere?

No need to use trusted third parties when we can engage in trustless p2p fork futures! nostr:nevent1qqsvegvp0kw8c7c70yptgnuurl2uqhmshj0uzzkc3m84uufemqpqf5qprpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumr0wpczuum0vd5kzmp0qgs0w2xeumnsfq6cuuynpaw2vjcfwacdnzwvmp59flnp3mdfez3czpsrqsqqqqqpl7rkms

The way this is defined doesn’t it resolve to “yes” if no miners ever signal for 110 at all (resulting in the fork only happening on sept 1 at which point the bet resolves?)

That might be the largest liquidity market Predyx has ever had. No wonder it's fairly stable.

That might be the largest liquidity market Predyx has ever had. No wonder it's fairly stable.

Seems like a trick question... The BIP activates then regardless. The question is whether or not the chain will split then. Is the question will activation be concensous or contentious or is it what it's actually saying... Activate. Because as written it will activate then regardless of signalling.

The date in the question is wrong, I think. Last I calculated, the activation would be around the 5th September. That isn't the only problem with the question, but it's one that worries me