Damus
Analogue Dog · 5d
I'm a little confused about your position. Surely static payment addresses, better gossip, and better lightning privacy is a good thing? I wasn't aware that Bolt12 opened the door to arbitrary data ...
Justin (shocknet) ⚡ profile picture
Bolt12 does nothing for privacy, blinded paths maybe do (debatable) but exist outside of Bolt12 (LND has had them for a long time already)

CLINK is better for static addresses, and more private since it's decoupled from the node, allows for HA, and is out of band on a web port.

(static addresses are a misnomer because Lighting is inherently synchronous, they're just pointers to a live endpoint)

Bolt12 is literally just invoice passing over Tor-like onion messages, fortunately LND has an option to disable them. Since you can't inspect them you can't block non-invoice data, Bolt12 is a vulnerability pushed by the minor implementations who went all in on phones-are-servers. Dumbest thing ever.
2
Analogue Dog · 5d
Onion routed payments mean that routing nodes can't collect telemetry on the payment details. Surely that's a privacy improvement. #Utreexo moves us a long way toward phones and other low cost devices become lightning nodes. There are some sub $60 options at waveshare.com
uncleJim21 · 5d
In CLINK how do you preserve network privacy when your node is interacting with nostr relays?