Damus
Giacomo Zucco · 45w
3) Not supposed to be a technical argument? The video I'm commenting goes way beyond purely technical issues, of course. I think the sentence “Bitcoin Core is trying to force everyone who uses Bitco...
Aaron van Wirdum profile picture
We’re probably close enough on 1 & 2 that we don’t need to split hairs :)

3. You could have just left out this point entirely and kept the debate in this thread technical and on-point. Instead you decided to insert a list of (what you perceive to be) bad behavior; completely unnecessary IMO.

But let me ask you a question then. What in your view has been a worse escalation:

A) _Anything_ any Core developer has said or done?
or
B) These accusations by Luke?
2
Giacomo Zucco · 45w
I totally disagree it was unnecessary: I am convinced that it is exactly that behavior to explain a lot of the current situation of "anti-Core sentiment", way more than the technical point itself, which I consider, like the video author, a nothingburger. The video itself is ending with a (imo correc...
LibreHans · 45w
According to modern core devs, calling bitcoin electronic cash is prescriptive and not acceptable. They would have rejected Satoshi's whitepaper for the title alone. It's sad to see all the people who work for bitcoin magazine, whose owners make money off shitcoins, forget all about bitcoins origins...