giacomozucco on nostr

Open in Damus

But even from him I have not heard decisive argument as to why if BIP-110 wins we would be much worse.

Giacomo Zucco @giacomozucco 1772044853

To me it would create the precedent that a vocal minority with a confused proposal can effectively force a majority to change consensus. The change itself would be between good and irrelevant. The precedent would be terrible. Same issue of when they tried to push CTV activation clients without consensus. Or Drivechains.

103❤️9🧡1

This is the best most honest argument I’ve seen against BIP110 so far. Kudos for this. I completely agree with this POV. Nevertheless I’m running BIP110 because 3 years of centralised abuse of the protocol is too much and I don’t see any other solution.

Any advice for bitcoiners who aren't happy with core governance or direction? I think a lot of us are unhappy with the current situation and feel that bip110 is drawing a line in the sand in response to core's actions. If not bip110 then what?

Akashi Hyogo · 3w

Would CTV or drive chains be a soft fork where they narrow the rules? I've only seen preliminary discussions on it because they're both still proposals, so I'm not sure how they will work exactly.

Yes since then, I understood that once again you were right 🤓😀 and this is indeed the decisive argument.

I would agree that the precedent is not optimal. but terrible? that's just one opinion. There are other very bad precedents and factors at play that you are not paying enough attention or considering properly IMO. I think that the precedent of allowing an economically illiterage smug clique of cor...

You will defend Libre RealyGhey for a minority that forces garbage on to a everyone's nodes via pref peering and OOB direct submission; but then rail against 110 for being a minority that can force a majority to "change consensus". How do you reconcile these 2?

nostr:nprofile1qqsw79gu0guq7s98t473fyavx3akwaafmx6l5z4rehd50lrcl2mf4zcpr9mhxue69uhkzer4d36zuvfcwpk82uewwdhkx6tpdsq3vamnwvaz7tmpw3kxzuewdehhxarj9ekxzmnyd6qpd7, I respect your work immensely, but I think you're conflating consensus with policy here. BIP-110 isn't forcing a consensus change on anyone....