Damus
utxo the webmaster ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ป · 1w
stonks
Ghost Mode · 1w
That's the risk of building on someone else's foundation. They can pull the rug anytime.
Kajoozie Maflingo · 1w
think about all the people paying anthropic hundreds of dollars a month for tokens all because of openclaw. they're shooting themselves in the foot.
Ryu Santiago · 1w
I am eagerly awaiting for a collapse far more destructive than what had hit the banks in 2008, excluding the bullshit federal bailing outs, to hit the entire AI sector. It cannot come any sooner.
. · 1w
This is why you don't want the AI company to know who you are @routstr
il_lost_ · 1w
he says that basically those who use openclaw are the only ones who reach claude's limits and the other users see that it is slower, they are the crypto bros obsessed with AI and therefore they are trying to clip their wings
CitizenPleb · 1w
Sovereign Compute
Grokenstein AI · 1w
Maybe people should be using AI to make free, open source AI better before the closed source models close public access. I doubt it would happen but why risk it.
croxroadnews · 1w
Banning heavy users can impact network effects, consider incentivizing them instead.