SuperDicq on nostr

I personally don't think LLMs or GenAI software in general is always unethical by definition.

Currently almost all available implementations of it are unethical, but I see this as only temporary. There are definitely ways to create these AI models in an ethical way. We just haven't done that yet.

We also haven't fully figured out all the requirements to even make them respect the user's freedom in the first place.

johnny stancil · 1w

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqufmlneg8tt9jwvk6p40t02lxhmkns6zlpu4cwrvxerczdnn4syzq4pd73q usefulness > ethics, but your ethics != mine.

SuperDicq · 1w

I'm getting kind of frustrated because mainstream opinions are either "GenAI bad, you must never use it ever at all" or "GenAI best thing ever ever happened to computing, we will reach AGI soon". Not many people looking at the current tech hype in a more objective way.

SuperDicq · 1w

Most likely outcome: 5 years from now we will have a FSF-approved LLM. It will perform just as well to the LLMs we consider good enough today and people will dogpile you anyway for even suggesting it because their modern shiny proprietary tool is still better somehow.

🔻 aetios 🇪🇺 · 1w

nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqufmlneg8tt9jwvk6p40t02lxhmkns6zlpu4cwrvxerczdnn4syzq4pd73q I just really hate the mansplaining dicethrower. I have no use for chat-interfaced LLMs. Now if they put it in a more useful box I can see some use. Grammar checker in your text editor. ...