Damus
Anita profile picture
Anita
@Anita
From what I read and understood from Proton’s docs is that their solution is actually less privacy preserving than a regular Bitcoin wallet. As your BTC addresses are associated with your Proton email one only needs to send you BTC, then one has the email connection to the BTC address though that transaction. So as long as they don’t have default coinjoins, it’s worse. But ppl will believe it’s more private because of their other products.

Also I saw no RBF or coin control.
94❤️11🤙4👀2☝️11❤️1
Shinoa Fores 🐷🐖🐹🐽 · 93w
People believe anything but the truth is where they draw the line! On wards 🫡
Michael Wolf · 93w
nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucnfw33k76twwpshy6ewvdhk6qg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aq93vhd7
running bitcoin · 93w
My first thought too. Why tie a utxo to my email yikes!
ĐaꝞꭵꞧuꞩ.₿ 🟠 · 93w
It's not private, but I don't think it's supposed to be. I think the goal is to be simple.
⚡️ᗪㄖ匚⚡️ · 93w
Gotta start somewhere 🤷‍♂️ Lightning would be a great next step as well.
Proton · 93w
Important clarification: If you use the Bitcoin via Email address, it of course must link one address in your pool with that email, but each transaction uses a different address from the pool so they are not linked together. It is also possible to disable Bitcoin via Email if it's not suitable for ...
Jon Millett · 93w
I am curious to see how this works out. At a minimum it is good to have more projects being developed in the space. Proton has the user base and stable funding to keep evolving and be there for the long term.