Define "good"

Good?

Very hit and miss. They have multiple axes to grind.

Definitely fall more on the side of right wing and entertain some questionable stories, much like that of Redacted show.

yes.

Should be in the mix, I think, but not a go-to. I'm a [LewRockwell.com](https://lewrockwell.com) kind of guy, for context.

The truth is a triple edge sword. Their side, your side and in the middle the truth. There's no such thing as unbiased media in my opinion. The epoch Times is OK, they are open about that bias favouring slightly to the right/libertarian. Though they do have an axe to grund sometimes. I live in the ...

Yes. A divergence from Leftist Government sanctioned MSM.

Haven't been for a pint there so unsure I'll get my coat....

It is for the people who at the moment are better than the worst ones, but who are still in the Matrix. And anyone in the Matrix is at risk of being used for evil purposes at any time. I would stick to nostr, Robert Breedlove, Bitcoin Magazine, Bukele and Max Keiser. Rt.com and zerohedge.com are bet...

Yes.

occasionally. Often very wacky, very out there. Think Zero Hedge -- some gems, some crazy, some reasonable.

epoch definitely has an agenda, tho occasionally they run some pretty solid pieces. readtangle.com is my go-to.

Partisan. Need a DVM that will subtract the propaganda.

¿Buena en qué sentido? ¿Es una pregunta retórica? No la conocía. En una revisión rápida, parece ser de extrema derecha. Personalmente, no dejaría de darle una mirada porque lo es. Una visión amplia requiere conocer puntos de vista alineados con tus preferencias y aquellos que no.

There epoch health section too

If you’re anti-China, yes. Run by Falun Gong I believe.

Meh, some good some bad. They speak some truth to the nonsense of our day, advocating for freedoms and proper rights. They also lean hard into the value system of Christian right who tend to weaponize their faith to justify otherwise abhorrent behavior.

These three opinions guys are (imho) excellent thinkers and writers: Roger L. Simon, Jeffrey A. Tucker, Tiffany Brannan

I like its origin story and stance against oppression.

It's run by a Chinese religious/political organization that is anti-China. So while it's a decent contrarian opinion, I wouldn't trust it.

One of the few pubs I am still reading. When most others went lockstep and pushed the C19 vaccine propaganda Epoch Times published articles on vaccine side effects and injuries. I have saved hundreds of ET articles in my library.

The Epoch Times is a good balance against the trapped mainstream media. Somethings are propangda-ish like any media, but it was very very welcome publication while mainstream was forcing the vaxx narrative and glorifying china a few years back. If you love CCP China, don't read this.

Jack is on a journey. It's hit and miss.

No.

I’m right of center and I find them… a bit too sensationalist for my tastes. Years ago I thought they were OK but these days the Epoch Times is sounding more like the Babylon Bee. Only they’re serious about what they post.

My experience with Epoch is from over a year ago. Mostly engaging in tolerable partisanship. They exist primarily to be against the CCP. It is refreshing to a certain audience. Spams email boxes incessantly. There is a difference among authors (C through A), and between the news-anchor style v...

Antiwar.com

Usually.

As long as you are aware of their agendas & factor that in when viewing/reading their content.

I call them "the Ray Epps of news". They are often on the right side of an issue, but push too hard into sensational which then distracts from the truth and ultimately does more harm than good.

nope.

I’ve been subscribed for a year. Some of their stuff is suss but it does provide a good perspective.

Thought question was about a beer hangout.

My take it’s anti-CCP propaganda mixed with regular news but I get the sense that it’s shadow-controlled by the CCP to gather intel on their enemies and detractors, could be wrong but LMK what you think

Like every publication they have a slant, but certainly worth reading to understand their POV.

If you like a sprinkle of facts smeared with a specific agenda. Often quotes way out of context or interpreted for you in a way that doesnt meet the original intent. Truly assumes no one will check the veracity of their claims.

Im just pleased your followers don’t just fall in line and delineate skepticism. Unlike the shitshow twitter has become.

https://open.substack.com/pub/jordyflock/p/supernatural?r=4h1wq&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

The best. Global News that’s ignored by MSM. Pro freedom.