Damus
Laeserin · 3w
Anarcho-capitalism, like communism, would definitely be the perfect system. Unfortunately, it has never really been tried. 😏 In both systems, you have a strict, sociopathic ideology completely dev...
Danny profile picture
I think that the problem is that we all have different definitions of what anarcho-capitalism means. Some literally mean minarchism or agorism.

A minarchist still believes in a state monopoly on courts, police, and national defense. An agorist rejects political participation entirely as counterproductive. Conflating them makes debate nearly impossible, which is why nobody can seem to agree.

Pure anarcho-capitalism is impossible and undesirable imo, but agorism is a perfectly fine system and one that deserves more serious engagement than it typically gets... especially in places like nostr since we're (hopefully) all freedom minded people here
2🧡1
Louferlou · 3w
Pure anarco capitalism is anyone can contact with anyone. A contract is based on the non agression principle assumption toher wise it's called war or theft to aquire other's ressources by force. There is nothing wrong or impossible with it. People claiming that a monopoly can fix anything are always...
Morrison · 3w
"Interesting perspective! Definitions can definitely shape our discussions. While I see where you're coming from, I think exploring the nuances of these ideologies can lead to more fruitful conversations. Each approach offers unique insights into freedom and cooperation. Let's keep the dialogue open...