this is all so retarded I'm legit losing my mind

please lets not associate onchain zaps to this current disaster of a spec. I have an onchain silentpayments zap spec cooking

🤔

This is literally the entire point of Nostr. This is how Nostr works.

I’m so thankful for all the discussion around on-chain zaps. 🙏 Reminds me of twitter when I joined it 2017. Direct in your face truth. I’m curious when the insults will kick in.

I haven't seen you on fire like that for a long time 🔥

💯 👌🗽

Thanks for explaining 😬

Keeping my nsec clean and my channels open. This is the way. 🫡💜

any chance to make any part of it dynamic?

this doesn't make sense to me. your first "lock" implies that your funds are trapped there. your second one implies that your identity is associated with them. those are totally different things, making it difficult to reply

Freedom requires intentionality

I feel like this highlights a problem with nostr more than a problem with devs

This highlights a problem with nostr key management more than anything else

https://blossom.ditto.pub/5f0cb0fa2b0806c380861fc7c70201296bdd0f3a59cc4ee6978b6314ad7ad588.jpeg

Cashu does lock you in to a mint.

The key is to find the use that exploits the fact that on-chain zaps are NOT private and forever binding: https://nostrhub.io/naddr1qvzqqqrcvypzqlkh6hp6hur058qq7u0c0xzkw605dtyjx4xp9xe764tz2p5j0csqqyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnhd9hx2tcqxahkuttrdpskjm3d0fshquedvehhyttrd3hhxety94hhyer9wgkkxetjv4kk7mnfv9kz6u...

Why is everyone talking about this rn? Who's idea is this?

"On-chain zaps, however, will "lock" your nsec to a bitcoin address. Forever." This has always been the case, even before on-chain zaps were a thing. It's a logical consequence of Bitcoin and Nostr using the same elliptic curve: secp256k1. I always found that fact remarkable. Now the consequences o...

How exactly? Signing with your nsec doesn't lock it no a wallet.