Damus
uncleJim21 · 4d
Great discussion with Richard Werner and Luke Gromen on PBD podcast. Richard has a really incredible grasp on history and economics. He presents a compelling case about the need for MORE small banks ...
Hu₿ertus the Austrian profile picture
Sure, there are quite a few things to agree with Prof. Werner.

My main difference with him is not in banking, the need to limit bank loans to production not speculation, or in decentralisation of banking. In this, we roughly agree.

The contention is in the production of the money to be used in banking.
Prof. Werner wants better rules for central banking.
I want central banking abolished.

In my framework, issue "banking" is no banking matter, the types of banking must be legally separated:
1. Credit minting (~issue banking) > Commercial banking > Investment banking.
2. Credit for production must be decentralised, peer-to-peer, and subsequent credit money production (minting) must be private, denationalised.
3. Credit money must be redeemable in a self-sovereign digital commodity, the best candidate being #Bitcoin.
4. Finally, we must build an unsurmountable firewall against any nation state interference in base money and credit money production.
2
lifeisjustreplication · 3d
All reasonable .. but won't this nice strict isolation of money from the state fall over easily as soon as some state "needs"/wants to go to war? War needs large amounts of money and if a state that is heavily indebted already just borrows more, it's credit rating especially when going to war will ...
uncleJim21 · 3d
Yea I think I'd agree. Your plan is how I would mesh it with a bitcoin maxi worldview. I think there is value in being strategically helpful to new businesses and entrepreneurs even on a bitcoin standard where there are heavy incentives to just HODL.