Damus
Dimi · 5w
When Duchamp put a urinal in a gallery in 1917, the art world called it genius. It doesn't matter what the object is, they said. What matters is the intention of the artist. When Warhol silkscreened ...
Sonja Northover profile picture
I get the point. If intention alone made the ready-made art in the era of Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol, then it's hard to suddenly argue that prompting an AI isn't also a conceptual act. That said, Duchamp and Warhol weren't removing craft from culture entirely. They were reacting against academic painting and questioning authorship. The irony is that now we're in a moment where people are reasserting the value of skill and embodied practice again. Maybe the tension isn't hypocrisy so much as the art world constantly swinging between concept and craft?
1
Dimi · 5w
Good point, and you're right that Duchamp and Warhol were reacting against something specific, not removing craft wholesale. I'd give them that. But I'm not sure the current moment is a genuine reassertion of craft. It looks more like a convenient one. The same institutions that spent decades rewa...