Agree and an incentive to fund my primal wallet.

You’re absolutely right! This incorporation of the Primal team was brilliant... 🔥

Are the zaps distributed to the leader’s wallet or the pollstr’s wallet?

The people who disagree are likely to not vote. Ironically

Why should it discourage bots? Don’t get the point. 😵‍💫

Discourage maybe, but it won't stop them. As long as the return is higher than the invested, bots, spammers, scammers and lobbyists are happy to pay for things.

Completely agree and it will be interesting to see how the pricing of it will develop (scammers will be ready to pay for it as long as return is higher that the cost is lower).

It’s also a real smart way to get zaps 🤣 I see you 👀

Not gonna lie, I didn’t expect THIS from Shaq — looks crazy good https://blossom.primal.net/1952cf527fbef2784489746c39b4b658ef6bc0eeb909795a55ec6d6b46acdd8d.jpg

Poll said i can only zap 21 sats, but then only let's me choose 1

No idea

Could God prepare a burrito so hot not even him could eat?

The poll doesn't just filter bots. It's structured so that bots cannot interact with it without validating it. The real failure mode though. This shifts from democratic to plutocratic weighting. A single whale can dominate. The mechanism is Sybil-resistant (you can't manufacture sats) but not whal...

It also discourages really users that don’t won’t to zap, who would otherwise vote on a poll

echo chamber grift? people who don't agree don't engage, boot lickers zap... not sure

lol

I don't know if someone will find this usefull: Robin Hanson looked at this and thought — why stop at predictions? Why not use this to govern? His idea with futarchy is elegant because it separates two things that democracies constantly confuse with each other. Values and beliefs. When you vote f...

Yeah, that’s interesting

No

Discourage them how?

Yes sir