Damus
Peter Todd · 74w
“Bitcoin’s lack of privacy is not an accident & it’s not the result of negligence. It’s a deliberate choice, as cowardly devs & sellout community members deliberately ignore a decade of resea...
Sjors Provoost profile picture
There also good reasons why Dandelion isn't in Bitcoin Core (yet). But why do a simple google search to learn why if you can score engagement by complaining?

This doesn't give me too confidence in the new publication, though of course I'm happy to be wrong.
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/81503/what-is-the-tradeoff-between-privacy-and-implementation-complexity-of-dandelion
7❤️2🤙3♥️1🫂1
Shadowy Badger · 74w
Thx for sharing that. I wonder if this was the source of the DoS attacks on the Monero blockchain a few years ago. Either way seems those wrinkles have been ironed out, so not sure if this old stack exchange answer still applies.
laanwj · 74w
this is the general theme, bitcoin has more considerations than just privacy, while monero has it as their marketing and can focus on it at the expense of everything else for one, syncing a monero node takes ages, and requires fast storage for the entire block chain instead of only a UTXO database,...
Peter Todd · 74w
Notably, Monero has much simpler transactions and mempool policies than Bitcoin. So implementing Dandelion correctly is quite a bit easier.
Vlad, Bitcoin Takeover Podcast · 73w
Thanks for the explanation, Sjors! I was wondering: why don’t you join my show to explain why Bitcoin doesn’t have better privacy to provide fungibility to the monetary asset? Or better yet, explain why nothing out there (including Zcash’s Halo2 and MWEB) is good enough for Bitcoin. So that n...