PeteWinn on nostr

We have to agree on some definition of success in order to discuss, right? Mine is something like, "a viable, scalable, user-oriented, replacement for the walled-garden web that provides censorship r...

Pete Winn @PeteWinn 1762155254

> Because that is what you sound like to me. Incapable of actually evaluating anything critically, instead leaning on whatever fallacies let you stay the way you are instead of become interested in outside things.

lol. Didn’t you suggest I should only talk about your ideas.

I think we’re done, but good luck with your thing

2❤️1

John Carvalho · 22w

Concession accepted. Let me know when you have counterarguments and can agree on definitions without being distracted.

Jake Woodhouse · 22w

In some ways Nostr is already a “success”, given it’s a thriving ecosystem of people building outside the status quo Do we have to put a definition on success? as relevant as it maybe for this discussion, it’s also limiting in its nature. Who knows what this might become! I am still no cl...

Six and Sons · 18w

Nostr is a hot mess. Impossible to build anything robust and scalable (I tried, and failed it). It would be - let's say 'scientific' - to understand and test a product, before dismissing it out of hand out of sheer butthurtness.