Damus
Open in Damus
Cyph3rp9nk profile picture
Cyph3rp9nk
@Cyph3rp9nk
When Luke speaks, he does so from the perspective that bip-110 has majority support and is bound to succeed, without considering the possibility of failure.

This is only half the truth and ignores the other half.

It is a completely politicized argument designed to deceive the unwary and uninformed.

As I said, it’s not much different from what Core has done with the spam.
Cyph3rp9nk @Cyph3rp9nk · 3w
And that's how politicians talk https://blossom.primal.net/f6a834bbbdc903684b15bbdc2ca53e6987a174aaa80bb7d7b5b4ffe51c41755b.jpg nostr:nevent1qqsgv86ghe3p67umzxx3kyjcf943cqd0lhr5tfpa0sza47y5upn2qqgzyr70wzj9e75p064gzwum4z3ht4cn6vtf7j3870w2c02fzyklvlfhuqcyqqqqqqgpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3e Show more
14❤️5
rieger_san · 3w
They all pushing their own narratives! Best is to use a client and configure it yourself. And after that! Only install updates if necessary
Travellight · 3w
appreciate this - my sentiments entirely. Mind you, Mechanic was a breath of fresh air on "what Bitcoin did." Its pick a hill time.
Tauri · 3w
Just because you’re not understanding what he’s saying doesn’t mean he’s not right. The opposition is not running a counter fork, so this means BIP-110 is technically uncontested.
Bitcoin Mises · 3w
Correct
Cruz 🏴‍☠️ · 3w
Yep. That’s his reply to me. I went back and fourth with him trying to extract answers. The end result https://blossom.primal.net/7030c434966507f25d73542af81dcd3aefce43591a06d9fcbfd9ed855439fa20.jpg
Branca · 3w
Well, you can take into account what Ocean is doing to address mining centralization to calibrate your compass.
SatsAreTheStateKiller · 3w
Yep… appreciate knots and actually leaning towards bip110 but this turns me off actually. Spam may be less dangerous than this fear mongering and hyperbole. Sad to see