You're response acknowledges the truth of what I said while denying it at the same time.
Your statement would be better worded as "We are limited finite beings with limited understanding, therefore ...
You are correct. I said it that way for a reason and should not be rewritten to fit personal beliefs
Anyone putting belief above truth is a fool or a sage, only time will reveal the difference.
Being honest and humble enough to allow others their belief as their truth is far superior to demanding others respect your truth without the respect of reciprocating.
Your last statement about denial is100% true; so does it apply to belief.
I find the original post hypocritical and disingenuous as THE TRUTH is intact unknowable. Just claiming the truth’s existence is either ignorance or deception.
We can only accept and acknowledge the truth so far.
Anyone putting belief above truth is a fool or a sage, only time will reveal the difference.
Being honest and humble enough to allow others their belief as their truth is far superior to demanding others respect your truth without the respect of reciprocating.
Your last statement about denial is100% true; so does it apply to belief.
I find the original post hypocritical and disingenuous as THE TRUTH is intact unknowable. Just claiming the truth’s existence is either ignorance or deception.
We can only accept and acknowledge the truth so far.