Is he wrong? Imagine a world where mining is actually decentralised. Where nodes ~ miners. Then that statement makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

This misses the whole sovereignty context. The argument goes round and round in circles in isolation of factoring in the centralisation of what was intended to be a decentralised currency.

The nodes are the mass of the system. The bits have joules, thus mass; literally. A large fork of nodes is a large fork of the chains mass, 2 histories of physical bits. The term economic nodes is loaded. For example an exchange is considered an economic node due to the amount of coins and velocity...

So, he comes clean. Whoever has the most dollars to buy the most ASICS, electricity, and people win. That's freedom money according to Samson Mowberg. Admission that Stablecoin integration is coming to the chain in 3...2...1...

Just another propagandist