And when there is an enemy that is impeding men from providing for women, be it a foreign invader, or, say, a banking cartel, it falls to men to identify and band together to eliminate that impedance.

Women should have a backup plan pending brofluencing failing to make any broad social impact.

Men should provide for women and women should not pretend to be men

Sure, if we’re talking about providing Bitcoin and financial sovereignty 🧡

ok show me the man then. as far as I can tell, yer all slaves... hard to respect. tell me where i am wrong. https://www.williamsandwilliamslawfirm.com/a-treatise-on-the-word-person https://image.nostr.build/8df59472902d0f8e255d08b2a3881da424333783f7cb6adaa166f206c3cb2a7d.jpg

Good start 👏 👏 👏 Kudos! But I couldn’t agree more personally

I have to go do just that tomorrow. It wasn’t planned but it must be done. Weekend rate is better anyway 🦅

How many women?

I wonder how long you’d last on blue sky with these takes

What, all of them? As an older bloke, I can tell you that the best martial advice I ever got was to not let money problems come into your marriage. He said that most arguments & divorces occur over money. Keep the money flowing & shield her from any monetary stresses & you'll have a long marriage....

But only one at a time.

I'm sorry to see it's controversial.

I think this goes beyond financially - strong men provide/hold space for women to thrive and flourish in their natural gifts. And beyond within partnership but within communities and in the world as well

As a happy wife, I don’t aggree on this one. I am not a feminist, I am feminine, but at the same time I enjoy earning my own money and stacking sats. We split out bills 50/50 and I’m genuinely happy with that. He offered to provide, but I want to pay my part cause I want him to know I’m with h...

Yes, but only out of love and admiration, not out of pity.

How bout this one : gendered words (actress, stewardess, etc) **_honor_** women, and the woke assholes are actually disrespecting women by changing the language.

Debunked

No. Men should provide for THEIR women — wives, mother's, daughters. Not women _in general_.

This take is like a 3 out of 10 on the spicy meter. 😂

Back in my day, we called men who didn't provide for women...pussies. Meaning "not a man".

Regular. How many wives are acceptable ?

If ya ain't taking care of her, someone else will 😎

Yes. And buy her something nice. https://blossom.primal.net/d8d3ffe034f60d898c22dd4d7813f28d29136a9bdbc34271b5566714f61098ea.jpg

Thank you 🤝

This might be more controversial on another platform, but if you wanted to draw out some complainers you may succeed in doing that.

That's not controversial, it's universal. Women either believe this explicitly or they believe it because they support taxation to fund welfare. Only the tiniest minority of lesbians don't believe in welfare.

One woman, maybe. But "women?" Nocando.

💯 agree and I would really love to be provided for 💯 However, I haven't been united with the love of my life yet... 😌

Not controversial in my worldview. I am yet to experience though. https://blossom.primal.net/a7485f0209989a1f9c9a6959d5d3d875a1ba79d5db545e0fcb71f6a50ce7f946.jpg

100%. Why go against thousands (if not millions) of years of evolution?

Very controversial to say that men should do things for women. Stunning and brave, @HODL. Stunning and brave.

It is getting more and more difficult to provide any meat besides other humans after a day's hunt. Meanwhile, women are wired to take care of shit for *generations*. They run the fucking camp. They do *almost* everything of real value. Often, though, they neglect to change the oil in their car's cra...

Which in turn frees up quality time raising children —> family legacies filled with love ❤️🌟🗽