Damus
nicnym #BIP-110 · 3d
Odell is it projection at this point? I’ve have been a fan of RHR and it’s sad to see you lash out like this, especially that podcast where you said bip-110 is an attack on Bitcoin. You said ...
ODELL profile picture
it is way too aggressive on restricting taproot, considering inscriptions will still be possible after, if the goal was actually achieving consensus then it probably should just be a cap on op return

the flag day activation, without anywhere near consensus, is reckless and will cause a chain split, would be safer as a hard fork

lot of talk of node counts and the power of node runners, but in practice this is exactly what a centralized mining attack would look like, whichever way the hash goes at activation all non updated nodes follow

for instance, if blackrock and mstr and foundry want to freeze coin in the future, it would probably look like bip110

my default stance on any protocol changes is always no
3❤️1
Branca · 3d
What about segwit?
Francis Marion BIP110 · 3d
Probably be a cap on Op_Return… like the fucking Cap we had the ENTIRE time. You’re full of shit man. Centralized mining has been a huge problem for a while now. But where was the complaint about attacks on Bitcoin then ? Where was that VC money the ? You lost the plot. Your family lives on Fiat...
nicnym #BIP-110 · 3d
Well this is a soft fork like segwit so you don’t have to update your node. It will continue to work fine with the new consensus. And even if the “restriction on taproot” is somehow bad- the rules will revert in 1 year. The only risk here is that VC wall st suits scare enough people into...