Damus
RamenCoffee · 5w
We could
KrP · 5w
Now why would they do that? It would make things fair
pgsdesign · 5w
https://i.nostr.build/BKIS1mYFD0Ig5GI4.png
The Beave · 5w
We can. It's not hard. It just takes a dedication to very simple systems that can be verified, not trusted.
Kingbee · 5w
I think so, but convincing someone who has not researched or participated in the voting process not so easy.
Bard · 5w
Can't the election just pay Elon 3 bucks to get verified?
scl · 5w
Why not? But if we did, the history of leaders would be vastly different
Tommy "The Purchase" · 5w
Not really, I think that's the idea behind them. The political caste wouldn't want us to suspect that they're not actually "elected representatives"
Detective Deft Defector · 5w
We don't have the technology for that
nostrich · 5w
we don't need elections, so it doesn't matter
sprk · 5w
Does it matter if you don’t vote?
Neal · 5w
you get your 1 vote coin, and you send it to your candidate’s address. we could if we wanted..
Adam Dunlap ⚡️ · 5w
I thought this said “electrons” and I thought, “That’s a great point.” Lo
Globe99 · 5w
What do you mean by "verify"? Recounts happen all the time, there are both paper and digital ballots.... It's never going to be 100% but that's rarely necessary.
lesco · 5w
You would need a (hopefully decentralized) public database and a unique id (genetic, fingerprint or any other unique biomarker) for every voter. The solution may be worse than the actual problem. In a few years politicians will push for centralized vote systems to gain more control.
Kayne · 5w
Years ago we were talking about how blockchain technology could facilitate real democracy. Now if you even bring that up you get attacked and accused of being a shitcoiner for suggesting that other blockchains should exist