Damus
Mike Brock · 161w
If bitcoin miners can afford to pay for their electricity at the prevailing market rate, then they are no different from any other consumer of electricity. The end.
🐢 profile picture
Except they aren’t, they are high use consumers.

This is a significant difference from the majority of electricity consumers, and is more akin to industrial users.

High electrical use can strain electrical infrastructure and reduce reliability of the whole grid. Ie-increasing wear and tear on transmission lines, transformers, switches, and limiting their lifespan.
3
Mike Brock · 161w
But the money that comes from the usage provides income for investment in maintenance and capital investment in increased capacity. Including investment in cheaper, cleaner energy.
harq · 161w
Texas proved that miners can serve a role in stabilising the grid by providing extremely fast response time with regards to adjusting supply/demand ratio. They are especially useful in areas where energy production is highly weather-dependant and thus unstable.
Tetsu Tamasi · 161w
A reliable customer its an incentive to strengthen the grid. Its a plus not a negative. For standards of living to go up (and we all want that even the greenies), we need more not less energy. Bitcoin mining is the best thing for the electricity producers.