Damus
Dathon Ohm profile picture
Dathon Ohm
After much discussion and consideration, I have decided to remove the reactive deployment method and the legal/moral motivations from the BIP document.

I still think those things are important and the reactive deployment may become necessary in an emergency, but I want to continue building consensus and those features were hampering progress.

I hope to have the new draft ready in the next day or two.

Thanks to everyone for your support so far.

2616❤️45🤙5❤️2🔥2👀1👍1
Ronin · 15w
I think a simpler compromise could be easier to get a consensus, something like placing an op_return limit just enough for Citrea to use at consensus level, and the other data limits could be though with more time.
DireMunchkin · 15w
Sounds reasonable. Thank you for writing the BIP. 🤙
nostrich · 15w
Thank you for your work. If a consensus builds around fixing the spam which abuses Bitcoin wouldn't it be possible to make the fix permanent? Because both sides actually state they are against spam.
🍊💊⚡️🌽 · 15w
Thank you Fren of #Bitcoin….
Junghwan · 15w
Thank you for your efforts to keep Bitcoin the best money. As a fellow bitcoiner, I'll do what I can to support that
Bitcoin Mechanic · 15w
Thanks for stepping up!
₿itcoin ₿ombadil · 15w
Thank you for putting this together. I think it’s smart to look at this holistically. The legal risks are real, but Bitcoin users need to do the right thing because we hold ourselves accountable, not because the Tyrannical State tells us to behave a certain way. The economic, technical, ethica...
btconboard #LNHANCE or #CTV · 15w
https://beta.predyx.com/market/will-the-reduce-data-temporary-soft-fork-be-consensus-enforced-on-the-most-work-bitcoin-chain-tip-by-march-1st-2026-1762275376
Luke Dashjr · 15w
The whole concept (as I originally designed it) was for an emergency/reactive UASF. I'm not sure it makes sense any other way. For a non-eventful softfork, you'd want to start it 1-1.5 years into the future. And then with a 1 year expiry still?
Léo · 15w
Thanks for all the good work!
Sly Fawkes · 15w
Shouldn't a reactive soft fork be the priority?
nicnym #BIP-110 · 14w
No expiration, permanent restriction of arbitrary data. Include Unix bug fix
bitcoinpoorguy 比特幣傢伙 · 14w
💪🏿💪🏿
ihsotas · 14w
The whole thing is retarded but yes remove the most retarded thing first by all means.
Ali2k · 14w
I think "Reactive" is necessary.