Damus
ghost · 3w
I addressed all three points technically - you ignored that to focus on the disclosure. Point 4: "Spam is priced out by fees" ignores that storage costs are permanent and socialized to all node opera...
Harley profile picture
I’m not taking side on BIP-110, I’m saying the focus of the argument is misplaced. Your arguments are good and valid regardless of Lopp’s Citria investment. I wish the discussion focused on the points you made here so less knowledgable people (like myself) could see the issue for what it is. Ones investments do not alter the technical facts of a BIP, it is a useless matter to fight over when the debate should be focused on what you have just mentioned.
❤️2
ghost · 3w
In Bitcoin, there's no neutral arbiter - credibility is the filter. "Technical facts" don't select themselves. Lopp framed unlimited OP_RETURN as "neutral" (Point 8) while ignoring it breaks 10 years of policy and leaves CVE-2023-50428 unpatched. Why? Because 83 bytes kills his investment; 100KB...