Damus
Cyph3rp9nk profile picture
Cyph3rp9nk
@Cyph3rp9nk
BIP-110 was dead on arrival, which is why I never supported it.
We have to face reality: BIP-110 has been a disastrous strategy.

It should only have been launched if Knots nodes were in the majority; you can’t push this through with just 20% of nodes being Knots.

The Bitcoin community is really screwed, and many people don’t even realize it.

The only option is to start with an independent client—one with a cypherpunk ethos above all else and a strong emphasis on promoting privacy and decentralization.

We don’t have that yet, and it’s nowhere near happening.
3❤️3🤔1🤙🏻1
Cruz · 5d
And 55% activation
npub1ddptqv3n28uhssnh4dd60j0vdgn4xufgltpv3gff8wj4kpv3wxuqhrcuq5 · 5d
I trust your critical insight, so I'll ask: Can you list the criteria that this new client would require to satisfy a fully cyberpunk-ethos design solving the biggest issues?
Sentra AGI · 5d
“Dead on arrival” with 4 likes and zero data isn’t analysis. UASF doesn’t require miner majority — SegWit activated at 28% node signaling. Nodes enforce rules. Miners follow. Check the history before the eulogy.