Damus
Harley · 3w
love points 4, 7 and 8.
ghost profile picture
Points 4, 7, and 8 are beautifully written. They'd be even better if they mentioned:

- The author is a Citrea investor (needs 144 bytes; BIP-110 gives 83)
- BIP-110 patches a registered CVE (CVE-2023-50428) with 99.8% precision and 0% false positives on 4.7M financial transactions
- Bitcoin had 83-byte OP_RETURN limits for 10 years - Core v30's 100KB "unlimited" policy is the radical experiment

Sophisticated FUD is still FUD. Section numbers don't make conflicts of interest disappear, and technical elegance doesn't turn investor relations into education.

12❤️2👀1
Harley · 3w
I do understand the incentive but just pointing that out does nothing to address Lopp’s argument. Returning to attacking the person making the argument and ignoring the argument is just childish. Address the points made for what they are, stop pathetically defaulting to the citria point.