Damus
jb55 · 6d
so they going to keep hardforking every time an external protocol changes?
nostrich profile picture
If we stop the childish tribal fighting and gradually and carefully tighten consensus rules over time to protect the monetary use cases, then it should be a soft-fork every time. All old nodes running old consensus rules would still validate the new blocks - only spammers should be impacted. Periodic spam mitigation could be bundled in with periodic security patches. If Core decided to do this, it wouldn’t even be contentious because most node runners use Core and its defaults. That would also end the concerns people have about Luke’s puritan views because Core could simply focus on spam mitigation and none of the other things Luke might want in the long term.
2
jb55 · 4d
yes we should implement covenants to not only preserve but also grow the monetary use cases
weev · 4d
Bitcoin’s genesis block has non-monetary transaction data. Satoshi put it there. “Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”. Satoshi called Bitcoin a “distributed database” from the start. If you’ve ever looked through the raw blockchain it has always been full of posts and bible ...