cc nostr:npub1m0n0nautpnk0jntmg89kgjucfwygrsppcpf963um5eqkjehqwess7rd0un

JFC 🤦‍♂️ I guess they don't use signing messages because most wallets don't offer it.

Using ETH as an example to the Satoshi test just typifies how far we've strayed from God's light. Plus, they're literally intending to tax you for signing a message you from 2 wallets one must have constructed with separate entropies. The travel rule is a joke and definitely implemented by peopl...

So, if this is required, you can't send to, say, your custodial account at Coinbase?

Also, if you're a cat and need to eject a hairball, google "eu travel rule compliance software".

Okay, so pay-join or coinjoin in and out of a decoy address? Think that'll fly?

Ignore CEX. Use Monero. Use Bisq or Reto. Ignore middle men.

I can't imagine doeing that. The EU enemy is datamining enough as it is'

I find it also funny they don't address the chicken-and-egg problem I am seeing of having to verify a new withdrawal address, which, of course, doesn't have any balance to do the test with in the first place. I'm assuming 'sometimes' (because they say 'might be') the satoshi test won't be needed? Ju...

European degeneracy