Damus
Learning Producers · 19w
“The answer is monetisation”— this reduces quality and what’s actually significant. Plenty of people brining in boatloads of money selling sugar and bs. The discussion must be more focused.
Short Fiat profile picture
The sugar and bs is what we currently have on legacy social media. Largely that is because everything is free and stuff that gets people addictived is promoted by the algos.

The key thing to understand with Fanfares is that the paywall creates friction.

You will only see the content if you choose to pay.

You will only choose to pay if you already know the work of the creator or if you are recommend by someone you trust.

If the content turns out to be sugar or bs, then you lose trust for both the creator and person who recommended. You remove them from your signal.

Your choice informs the web of trust of everyone connected to you.

We are the algorithm in this system!

2
Dave Nicholls · 19w
Will it be possible to allow someone to watch 10 or 20% of the video first, before paying to gain full access? I think this would be vastly beneficial to all parties. Offering a bit for free is a good model. Profits and monetization always improve quality. Learning Producers is completely wrong. ...
Learning Producers · 19w
I do agree with your point about the algos promoting addictive stuff and I’ll keep fanfares in mind. Friction is def necessary in building worthwhile products and services. I just don’t like when the blinders get put on as soon as number goes up.