Cyph3rp9nk on nostr

I'm curious about the bad Linux distribution that they were peddling because I've never once heard anyone speak favorably about Linux outside of a couple nerds who are IT experts. I know no one is pus...

Cyph3rp9nk @Cyph3rp9nk 1785826323

From a security standpoint, Arch Linux is terrible, for example.
Any distribution worth its salt must include the following by default:
- Secure Boot
- SELinux or AppArmor
- Firewall
This rules out most “geeky” distributions that have neither Secure Boot nor SELinux or AppArmor.

2❤️1👍1🤙1🧡1

𝕞ptf · 4w

Pretty easy for an AI model to break into any distro tbh.

JackTheMimic · 4w

Secure Boot- What is a verified vendor of Linux? By that definition is Gentoo a terrible distribution because you'd have to compile all of those programs yourself and it's not by default? The only way I would say that a specific distribution is bad is if you literally can't use those security modu...

nostrich · 4w

What about degoogled phones? GrapheneOS relying onlybon pixels with its closed security chip? Better lineage, iodé and calyx? #asknostr

Andro · 4w

Debian has a big community and is the base of a lot of distributions

trev · 4w

Why would you mention Secure Boot but not LUKS. Secure Boot doesn't seem very important if the entire drive is encrypted, right?

Rm -rf · 4w

i suppose it really depends on what you are using it for. arch is my go to just works distribution, and you can make out of it whatever the fuck you want, there is nothing about arch that doesn't let you make it reasonably secure. most people don't bother because most people don't value security, bu...