Damus
Semi-Normal · 132w
It's decidedly less efficient for everyone who benefits from the manipulations (possibly unpopular, but I'd argue most Americans benefit at the expense of the 3rd world). I do think btc is objectivel...
Mike Brock profile picture
My point is the temporal nature of savings is a social construct. Even with sound money, it's not a perfect proxy for the availability of capital, nor does it account for capital depreciation across time, relative to the production in which the savings were accumulated.

You can do some basic thought experiments here to realize how this concept is purely normative.

Let's say you diligently saved up bitcoin for your whole life, and then suddenly, one day, every factory in the planet shut down. For whatever reason. Alien mind control, whatever. The point is you just have to imagine everyone stopped making "stuff" all at once.

What would your bitcoin be "worth"?

It's a silly example, but it reveals the socially contingent nature of all of this.
1🤙2
Mike Brock · 132w
Moreover, the value of savings is tied to the productive capacity of the economy. If an economy is more productive, each unit of saved currency can command more real goods and services in the future. However, if an economy’s productivity stagnates or declines, the real value of savings may decreas...
Semi-Normal · 132w
Completely agree with this. To over simplify... the % of the money you want to spend now roughly equates to the % of the stuff that's available to buy now. Savers increase the spending power of current spenders by reducing the amount to be spent now, producers increase (or decrease) the spending p...