Damus
Cory Doctorow · 23w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq2spdmtqs75xq7mje3am8jq0nr33rkclkyzxm8r22l7w92f0zqsqsdfepsg Yes, there's some interesting edge-cases implicit in this new, more explicit rule that...
Arvīds Kokins profile picture
@nprofile1q... Hypothetically, if someone were to extract all the brush strokes from a file, wrote them into a book, retyped that book back into a file and re-rendered them to claim that it's original work, to me that's still a clear-cut infringement, not even de minimis (which could apply if only e.g. less than 0.1% of the brush strokes were used).

At the end of the day, copyright is an economical tool to ensure the author is fairly rewarded for their work, not an obfuscation challenge.
1
Cory Doctorow · 23w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq2spdmtqs75xq7mje3am8jq0nr33rkclkyzxm8r22l7w92f0zqsqsdfepsg > retyped that book back into a file and re-rendered them to claim that it's original work You are describing an infringing *use*, which does not make the machine itself infringing. T...